The English Department Website

 

IST English Department

A1 IB Study Guide - Tony Harrison

Heredity

How you became a poet's a mystery!
Wherever did you get your talent from?
I say: I had two uncles, Joe and Harry -
one was a stammerer, the other dumb.

____________

...the tongue that once I used to know
but can't bone up on now, and that's mi mam's

(from Wordlists II)

__________________

So right, yer buggers, then! We'll occupy
your lousy leasehold Poetry.

(from Them & [uz])

________________

Harrison identifies his two uncles, one dumb, one a stammerer, as his influences. Throughout his work he show that poetry is not the cultural property of the elite and he expresses anger at the ways in which this myth has been perpetuated. He understands the power of cultural elitism and the ways in which his education (Grammar school then Oxford university) cut him off from his working class roots.

The importance of his family background is evident in Harrison's poetry. There's uncle Joe, who compensated for his stammer by hand-setting printer's type faster than he could talk, Uncle Harry, stabbing the dictionary for words, his Grandfathers: a fell farmer, a publican and a railway signalman, his Dad, a baker, and his Mam. His ancestry is central to his identity as a poet. coming from a background where there were no books, and living amongst people who felt themselves to be inarticulate (although his poems are a testament to the paradoxical eloquence of these "inarticulates") Harrison was, "voraciously obsessive about acquiring language and power over language".

Harrison's obsession for language is manifested in the way he plays with words. He creates new words, "littererchewer", (Them & [uz]) and combines old words into new compounds, "Cissy-bleeding-ro" (Me Tarzan). The point is never to mysitfy or exlude. Harrison never claims an "elevated" or "restriced" or "appropriate" language for poetry, he claims all language for poetry. Harrison puts a Leeds dialect word next to a Latinate word Milton would have used, he harnesses formal language to the language that kicks around the streets. Through his poetry he attempts to empower the disempowered. His tone is energetic, aggressive and at times tender and regretful. Paradoxically his championing of those excluded from "Literature" is framed in a very literary form.

have a look at the  British Council resource