 | |
IGCSE Marking Criteria – Paper 2
Question 1 -
Content
|
Band
|
Marks
|
Characteristics
|
|
1
|
13-15
|
Ideas developed with understanding and originality.
Infers perceptively. Character emerges from tone, detail and attitude.
|
|
2
|
10-12
|
Examples of well developed ideas from
the passage. Convincing
|
|
3
|
7-9
|
Generally satisfactory but some misinterpretation.
Plenty of references but ideas not developed. Passage generally
efficiently read at least for explicit meaning
|
|
4
|
4-6
|
Straightforward reference to the passage. Some
unlikely elements and little originality although main aspects understood
|
|
5
|
1-3
|
Answers general and little reference to the passage
|
|
|
0
|
Utterly useless
|
Question
1 -
Quality of Writing
|
Band
|
Marks
|
Characteristics
|
|
1
|
5
|
Clear and coherent with an effective and convincing
register
|
|
2
|
4
|
Generally clear, mostly coherent, some effective
language
|
|
3
|
3
|
Some clarity, language appropriate
|
|
4
|
2
|
Attempt to sequence ideas, language is simple but
correct
|
|
5
|
1
|
Poor syntax, general meaning communicated but only
adequately
|
|
|
0
|
Utterly useless
|
Question 2
|
Band
|
Marks
|
Characteristics
|
|
1
|
9-10
|
Wide ranging discussion of language with high quality
comments that add meaning and associations to words and demonstrates the
writer’s reasons for using them. May group choices of words to identify
writer’s objectives
|
|
2
|
7-8
|
Reference is made to a good number of words and
phrases, some of which identify the intended effects. Candidate clearly
understands the task
|
|
3
|
5-6
|
Satisfactory attempt to identify appropriate words
and phrases. Gives meanings of words but does not identify effects.
|
|
4
|
3-4
|
Candidates select words although weaker words may be
included whilst stronger words are neglected. Explanations are noticeably
less well done and do not add much to the choice of words
|
|
5
|
1-2
|
Choice of words is insecure, no evidence that
writer’s choice of language has been appreciated
|
|
|
0
|
Utterly useless
|
|